You are currently browsing the The SEM Blog blog archives for February, 2013.

Want More? Sign Up for our Schipul SEM Team Email Newsletter:



Archives

  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007

Archive for March, 2010

SXSW Panel – Social Search

posted by Jonti Bolles
Monday, March 15, 2010

Social Media and Search have had a intertwined relationship in their emerging development. Now with real-time search of social media streams, the two are more related and supportive than ever. Today’s panel of experts takes a look at what social search is and what it isn’t, who’s working on it and getting it right, and perspectives on making search and discovery more relevant to users. Panelists include: Max Ventilla of Aardvark, Marc Vermut of Fine Point Solutions, Brynn Evans, Scott Prindle of Crispin Porter + Bogusky and Ash Rust of OneRiot. I have coffee and they are playing some Inertia rock this morning while everyone set’s up. Let’s get started.

What is Social Search and how does it benefit the social graph?

Brynn Evans is first up. She is a digital anthropologist looking at what people are doing onilne and how we design for social interactions to be integrated with Search. Search is no longer just a question inside a box. But, how can our friends help us. Search is a process over time. She defines three flavors of social search. Collective, Friend -filtered, and collaborative. People exhibit two main social strategies. Some want to ask the network for help and guidance before doing a search on their own. Others distinctly want to embark alone first and see what they can gather. It’s not until they can’t find what they are looking for when they ask friends or networks.

Next is Max Ventilla as a Google zookeeper after his startup Aardvaark was acquired by Google. Subjective questions generate majority of revenue. But and unreliable and there is a social cost of asking a favor. How do you find the best person to answer your question? Each individual’ network is growing exponentially. In queries of subjective nature, average query is 19 words as opposed to Google 3-4 words. Social context is different than the social graph, the context is frequently sufficient. Went to same school, etc. Intimacy (more than authority) facilitates trust.

Ash Rust is Director of Search Relevance at OneRiot. Advertising is matched with realtime web and focused on indexing what people are talking about in social media. Delivers very realtime both in browser and app modes for a swarming type of distributed tool. Ask the masses for best answer.

Prindle is thinking about social search in the digital marketplace. “Give customers something good to talk about in social media, and they will talk. That conversation becomes content for social search, helping to drive additional traffic and conversation.” This sharing used to happen in email, but is not happening in public. Advertising space for many years has been start in TV ad, then drive other marketing efforts. New model example: Best Buy’s @Twelpforce as example of social search platform. Using TV to extend to wider audience.

Where is Social Search going?

Will these new forms of search overtake the Google Box? 20-40% of queries can be handled by social search currently according to Rust. It depends if they will overtake. Different responses are useful in different search. Brynn comments that we often go to Google for an answer, but still need the next level of social relevance. I have an answer, what do I do with it? Then network can follow through. Rust chimes back in with how to rank in social algorithms based on history of streams and their diversity of content. Inference of smaller groups or networks and may highlight authority.

Brynn biggest problems are who is an authority, how to index them, and how to index friends. OneRiot and Aardvaark answer these in different ways. Aardfavrk is a response to the tremendous social activity happening online. OneRiot recognizes the need for different search. For example, a simple search for “killer whale” might bring up lots of information about whales, Orca, etc. But not necessarily what the ongoing conversation is about social responsibility of killer whales in SeaWorld shows after news item of killer whale attack.

Monetization of Social Search and Advertising

Reverse delivering search information starts with answers, then builds brand. Nash talks about the monetization of Social Search. Traditionally, you draw people coming to you with a clear commercial intent. Then they ask you want they want and you can answer with incentive. New model focuses on not just PPC. First deliver organic answers, then deliver sponsored ads not only at cost of PPC, but discounts on bid based on delivering good responses. Bad responses will not be rewarded. Asking people first if they want a sponsored ad typically is over 50% for opt-in. Social search will allow advertisers to target user intent and not just users.

New model is not about buying keywords, but creating content the social search indexes. Headlines are being tracked more than keywords. Links are still more important than keywords. Anchorlinks and number of people linking to your content is more important than the actual keywords and will continue to drive ranking and indexing.

How do you Measure Social Search?

Finally, in measuring social search, @ventilla on social analytics: “Who you are connected to is more important than how you describe yourself.” True analytics of social search is still TBD. Will be a growing area of research.

Accessibility for Everyone is Good Design

posted by Jonti Bolles
Sunday, March 14, 2010

We often get caught up with coding to make our websites crawlable for search engines. This morning, Sharon Rush of Knowbility and Richard Schwertdfeger of IBM offer the current state of accessibility and where it is going. Making sites accessible for everyone, regardless of disability, is good design. If you create good design, then it should address all users. Search engines have been supportive of accessible adoption features and will likely continue to do so as it makes usability a factor in delivering good content.

What has been successful in accessibility?

WAI-ARIA is a set of accessibility specs that focus on tooling and reporting. One example that is near final adoption and integration is http://www.openajax.org/member/wiki/accessibility and is helping understand things like dynamic content. But some of the problems with accessibility still exist in mashups. Example such as a simple Google Map with rapid integration of complex visualizations make usability a problem when integrated with third party Assistive Technologies.

Accessibility and interaction are key. Can simple image mashups be built in tables instead or provided as an alternate render and transcript? Can maps work with geolocated address books to coordinate? Yes, this would be good design/usability for everyone. There is the key point of the day. If it is good for everyone, it stops being about accessiblity. Ex. In HTML 5 CSS media queries, allow selection of embedded styling to turn on the transcript view as set in browser default rendering. It will just work for everyone depending on preferences set. Don’t require alternate interfaces that increase development costs.

What Tools and adoptions are still needed?

On-Demnd Personalization

working within DCO with W3c is a Delivery Context Ontoolgy. Set preferences for alternatives to mapping and On-Demand delivery can deliver the data based on adaptations to the environment.

National Public Inclusive Infrastructure – NPII

NPII is a bigger solution to deliver software enhancements so non-standard interfaces can use broadband information and services available to others. Building accessibility and extended usability directly into the Internet’s Infrastructure including a common set of development tools to lower development costs. If tools are deliverable via cloud, then accessible tools will be available to anyone with licensing when needed on their device. Example: Web apps to have web-delivered content (alternative renderings, captions) delivered as assistance on demand.

Accessibility Resources at:
http://wiki.knowbility.org/sxswi-2010/ with Rich’s PowerPoint deck and NPII

Models to be supported in the NPII

NPII is a resource to learn about the specific models of information delivery.

Picture of 4 models of accessibility.

The NPII will support a number different delivery models in order to address the different platforms, degrees of lockdown, and type of adaptation a person requires. For example a person who is blind may need a screen reader that is integrally tied to a browser (Model 1 or 4) while someone who has colorblindness may only need occasional color shifting of content and could use Model 2 or 3. Any of the 4 models might be used on a computer that allows installation of access software while Models 3 or 4 may be needed on a computer that is completely locked down.

Stop talking about accessibility

The great take away from this panel session comes from Sharon Rush again. Sharon is a huge advocate of stopping the talk about accessibility and design. The hope is one day to stop talking about accessibility as a separate thing and move the development toward good design that incorporates everyone.